Site Map | Mark A. Strauss Law

Skip to content

Home
Attorney
Practice Areas
False Claims Act

Customs Fraud

Government Procurement Fraud

State False Claims Acts

COVID-19 Relief Fraud

Healthcare Fraud

Grant Fraud

Federal Credit Assistance Fraud

Securities Fraud

State & IRS Tax Fraud

Securities & Opt-Out Litigation

FINRA Arbitration

Fraud is their game. Integrity is yours.

Call or Text today

212.729.9496

Click Here to Email Us

Schedule a Consultation
Reviews
Blog
Media
Selected Publications

Media Mentions

Press Releases
Contact

FREE CONSULTATION

Call or Text today

Serving U.S. & International Clients

Pages

How to File a Qui Tam Lawsuit Under the False Claims Act
How Long Do You Have to File a Whistleblower Complaint Under the False Claims Act?
What Should I Do if I Suspect My Employer is Committing Customs Fraud?
Can a Whistleblower File a Complaint if They Live in a Foreign Country?
Do Whistleblowers Get Compensated?
Can a Competitor File a Whistleblower Complaint?
Can a Whistleblower Remain Anonymous?
Section 301 Tariff Evasion Whistleblower Lawsuits
Fraudulent Evasion of Antidumping & Countervailing Duties
Customs Fraud by Misclassification of Imported Goods
Illegal Transshipment & Country-of-Origin Fraud
Fraud by Undervaluing Imported Goods
Thank You
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
Securities Litigation Practice Areas
Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
Whistleblower Lawyer
Customs Fraud Whistleblower Attorney
COVID-19 Grant Fraud Lawyer
Healthcare Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
Government Contracting & Procurement Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
Federal Grant Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
Federal Loan Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
Securities Fraud & the SEC Whistleblower Program
Tax Fraud Whistleblower Lawyer
State False Claims Act Laws
Securities Class Action Opt-Out Lawyer
FINRA & Securities Arbitration Attorney
Mark A. Strauss Law PLLC Announces $3.64 Million Settlement of Customs-Fraud Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuit
Mark A. Strauss Law PLLC Seeks Customs Fraud Whistleblowers With Information Regarding the Transshipment of Chinese-Produced Goods Through Other Countries to Evade U.S. Section 301 Tariffs
Press Releases
Media Mentions
Selected Publications
Media
Bio
Reviews
Home
Blog
Site Map
Contact Us
Whistleblower Law Practice Areas
About the Firm

Blog

Major Victory for Customs Fraud Whistleblowers: Federal Appellate Court Upholds $26M False Claims Act Verdict, Rejecting Importer’s Defenses
CBP Exposes Major Chinese Magnesium Transshipment Scheme: What Customs Fraud Whistleblowers Need to Know
DOJ Intervenes in Whistleblower Lawsuit Alleging Millions in Evaded Customs Duties
CBP Cracks Down on Xanthan Gum Transshipment Schemes
DOJ Announces $8.1 Million Settlement in Customs Fraud Whistleblower Case
Importer Convicted of Undervaluation Reaches Asset-Forfeiture Deal with U.S.
U.S. Customs Cracks Down on Scheme to Evade Import Duties on Chinese Pipes
Jewelry Importer Sentenced to Prison Over Transshipment Scheme
CBP: Importers Evaded Customs Duties on Transshipped Chinese Goods
Chinese Goods Fraudulently “Transshipped” through Third Countries to Evade Customs Duties, U.S. Says
U.S. Accuses Importer of Circumventing Antidumping Duties
Importer Pleads Guilty to Evading Customs Duties
Wire Importer Sued for Evading $28M in Customs Duties
Whistleblower Lawsuit Ends in $25M Price-Fixing Settlement
Importer Pays $7.6M to Resolve Customs Fraud Whistleblower Claims
Court Enters Judgment against Importer for $1.3M in Customs Fraud Whistleblower Case
Importers Sentenced to Prison for Fraudulently Evading $42M in Customs Duties
Ford Pays $365M over Brazen Scheme to Underpay Customs Duties
Opportunity Beckons for Cryptocurrency Tax-Fraud Whistleblowers
Customs-Fraud Whistleblower Case Settled
Importer Pays $2.5M to Settle Customs-Fraud Whistleblower Case
Whistleblower Lawsuit over Evaded Import Duties Nets $3M Settlement
Importer Settles False Claims Act Lawsuit alleging it Failed to Pay Marking Duties.
Whistleblower Receives $203K Award as Public-Relations Firm Settles False Claims Act Lawsuit over PPP Loan
Whistleblower awarded $1M as Drug-Testing Firm Pays $5.9M to Settle Kickback Allegations
Adobe Pays $3M to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuits over Alleged Kickbacks involving Government Software Sales
Government Recovers $9.5M in False Claims Act Lawsuits against For-Profit Schools over Post-9/11 GI Bill Funding
Johnson & Johnson Subsidiary Pays $9.75M to Settle Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuit over Alleged Kickbacks
Public College and Former Professor Pay $575K to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuit over Misuse of Federal Grant Funding for Vacations, Bonuses, Outside Research
Samsung Unit Pays $1M to Resolve False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawsuit over Alleged Customs Fraud
Government Contractor NortonLifelock Found Liable for Defrauding the GSA, Ordered to Pay $1.7M, in False Claims Act Lawsuit
Vitamin Manufacturer Pays $22.8M to Settle Whistleblower Lawsuit over Evaded Customs Duties
Laser Technology Firm Settles Allegations It Violated the False Claims Act by Improperly Using Foreign Subcontractors on Federally Funded Research Projects
Apparel Wholesaler Pays $1.3M to Resolve Allegations it Undervalued Imports to Evade Customs Duties
Ophthalmologist Pays $1.85M to Settle Allegations She Violated the False Claims Act by Fraudulently Billing Medicare for Unperformed, Medically Unnecessary Procedures
Academy Mortgage Pays $38.5M to Resolve Whistleblower Allegations it Violated the False Claims Act by Falsely Certifying Compliance with FHA-HUD Underwriting Requirements
Court Awards Whistleblowers $500K in Attorney’s Fees following False Claims Act Lawsuit relating to Defense Contractor’s Alleged Illegal use of Chinese-Sourced Materials in Tank Munitions
Cardiac Monitoring Firms Pay $45M to Settle Whistleblower Allegations they Violated the False Claims Act by Submitting Ineligible Claims to Federal Healthcare Programs
9th. Circuit Appeal Highlights False Claims Act Safeco Defense Controversy
Electronic Health Records Firm ModMed Pays $45M to Settle Whistleblower Allegations it Violated the False Claims Act by Paying and Receiving Kickbacks in Connection with “Donated” EHR Software
Importer Pays $3.25M to Resolve Whistleblower Allegations it Violated the False Claims Act by Skirting Section 301 Tariffs on Chinese Imports
NY Nonprofit Pays $86K to Resolve Whistleblower Allegations it Violated the False Claims Act by Defrauding the Paycheck Protection Program
Honeywell Int’l Pays $3.35M to Settle False Claims Act Allegations over “Defective” Zylon Bulletproof Vests Supplied to the U.S. Military
Justice Dept. Alleges Health Insurer Cigna Violated the False Claims Act by Artificially Inflating the “Risk Scores” of its Medicare Advantage Members to Boost its Capitation Payments
Florida Medical Group Pays $130K to Settle Allegations it Violated the False Claims Act by Accepting Kickbacks from Pharma Distributor Cardinal Health
Supplier of Military-Grade Firefighting Materials Settles False Claims Act Allegations it Sold the U.S. Government “Defective” Fire-Suppression Foam
Milwaukee Advertising Agency BVK Pays $2.25M to Resolve Whistleblower Allegations it Fraudulently Obtained COVID-19 Relief Funds by Falsely Certifying its Eligibility
Philips Respironics Pays $26M to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuits over Alleged Kickbacks to DME Suppliers; Whistleblower Awarded $4.3M
Biogen Settles False Claims Act Kickback Lawsuit for $900M; Qui Tam Relator Receives Record $250M Whistleblower Award
Pharmaceutical Giant Bayer Pays $40M to Settle False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawsuits Over Three Drugs
Helicopter Flight School and Community College Pay $7.5M to Settle False Claims Acts Whistleblower Lawsuit
Medical Device Manufacturer Biotronik Pays $12.95M to Settle Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuit over Physician Kickbacks
Defense Contractor Pays $9M to Settle False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawsuit Involving Cybersecurity Noncompliance
Firm Wins $24M False Claims Act Judgment, $2.7M in Attorney’s Fees, against Corporate Rival over Evasion of Anti-Dumping Duties on Chinese Imports
California Companies Affiliated with Chinese Billionaire “Uncle Liu” Found Guilty of Fraudulent Scheme to Dodge U.S. Customs Duties on Aluminum Imports, Ordered to Pay $1.8B in Restitution
Qui Tam Relators Stand to Receive Significant Whistleblower Rewards as Electronic Health Records Firm Settles False Claims Act Lawsuit for $18.25M
Qui Tam Relator Receives $4.6 Million Whistleblower Reward as Boeing Subsidiary Pays $25 Million to Settle False Claims Act Lawsuit over Inflated Costs of Drone Parts
Eleventh Circuit Takes Broad View of Escobar’s Materiality Requirement, Reviving $240 Million Qui Tam Whistleblower Lawsuit Involving Unallowable Fees Included in VA Mortgage Loan Guarantees
Falsely Certifying Eligibility to Participate in Government Programs can Give Rise to Liability under the False Claims Act Post-Escobar, Court of Appeals Holds
Supreme Court of Illinois Upholds Qui Tam Whistleblower Provisions of State Insurance Claims Fraud Prevention Act
The Shield of Qualified Immunity is Unavailable as a Defense under the False Claims Act, Appellate Court Holds
Qui Tam Whistleblower Awarded $3.7 Million as U.S. Settles with German Engineering Firm for Ducking Customs Import Duties
Financial Institutions can be Sued under the Whistleblower Provisions of the False Claims Act for Defrauding the Federal Reserve
Whistleblowers Share $1.48 Million Reward as Importer of Brake Pads Settles Customs Fraud Lawsuit for $8 Million
Federal Contractor CDM Smith Pays $5.6 Million to Resolve Whistleblower Claims under the False Claims Act Arising out of Scheme to Overcharge Navy
Appellate Court Approves Whistleblower’s use of Third-Party Litigation Funder, Affirms $255 Million Verdict against Skilled Nursing Facilities for Medicare Fraud
Whistleblower Awarded 22% of Recovery as U.S. Settles with Importer for Fraudulently Underpaying Customs Duties on Diamond Jewelry
Qui Tam Whistleblowers, Government Target Downstream Parties over Suppliers’ Import Duty Evasion
Third Circuit Rejects Eleventh Circuit’s “Objective Falsehood” Requirement under the False Claims Act, Rules that Clinical Medical Judgments Can be Considered “False”
Courts of Appeal Clarify: Class Representatives from Every State Are Not Necessarily Required for Multistate Class Actions
When an Overly-Influenced Federal Agency Sides with the Accused under the False Claims Act: Whistleblower Claims, Materiality and “Regulatory Capture” in the Trinity Industries Appeal

Categories

Tax Fraud
Qui Tam Lawsuits
Qui Tam (False Claims Act) Litigation
Insurance Claims Fraud
Healthcare fraud
Grant Fraud
Financial Fraud
False Claims Act
Education Fraud
Customs Fraud
Credit Assistance Fraud
COVID-19 Relief Fraud
Contracting & Procurement Fraud
Class Actions
Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS)

Fraud is their game.
Integrity is yours.

Ready to take a stand? Contact Mark A. Strauss Law to discuss your whistleblower claim. We provide the expertise and support you need to pursue justice.

Serving U.S. & International Clients

Schedule a Consultation

Quick Links

Home
About Us
Blog
Contact Us

Home
About Us
Blog
Contact Us

Practice Areas

False Claims Act
Customs Fraud
Government Procurement Fraud
State False Claims Acts

False Claims Act
Customs Fraud
Government Procurement Fraud
State False Claims Acts

COVID-19 Relief Fraud
Healthcare Fraud
Grant Fraud
Federal Credit Assistance Fraud

COVID-19 Relief Fraud
Healthcare Fraud
Grant Fraud
Federal Credit Assistance Fraud

Securities Fraud
State & IRS Tax Fraud
Securities & Opt-Out Litigation
FINRA Arbitration

Securities Fraud
State & IRS Tax Fraud
Securities & Opt-Out Litigation
FINRA Arbitration

[email protected]

Linkedin-in Facebook-f Twitter

We serve clients internationally and nationally, including, but not limited to, those in the following localities: Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dallas–Fort Worth, Denver, Detroit, Honolulu, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Portland, San Bernardino-Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis, Tampa–St. Petersburg, and Washington, D.C.; the European Union, the United Kingdom, and China.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

©2025 Copyright markastrausslaw.com | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map

Site and SEO by Razor Rank

©2025 Copyright markastrausslaw.com Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map

Site and SEO by Razor Rank

English

Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
ภาษาไทย
Español
Português

Home
Attorney
Practices
Reviews
Blog
Media
Contact Us

Free Consultation

Call or Text Now

Click Here to Email Us

Request Consultation