Justia Lawyer Rating
The State Bar of California
Federal Bar

COVID-19 Relief Fraud

Restriced Area - CovidTimes of crisis tend to bring out the best in people. Unfortunately, however, they also sometimes bring out the worst. For example, in the aftermath of past national emergencies such as Hurricane Katrina and the 2008 Financial Crisis, frausters perpetrated all manners of unlawful schemes to divert Government funds intended for victims into their own pockets. Now it is feared the same is happening with the government's COVID-19 relief efforts.

As with past crises, qui tam whistleblowers are being counted on to combat fraud and to help ensure that COVID-19 relief funds are spent properly and not wasted, misused, or stolen. The stakes could not be higher. Lives could depend on it. In March 2020, the United States Attorney General issued a memorandum to U.S. attorneys nationwide stating that “the pandemic is dangerous enough without wrongdoers seeking to profit from public panic and this sort of conduct cannot be tolerated” and that it was “essential that the Department of Justice remain vigilant in detecting, investigating, and prosecuting wrongdoing related to the crisis.”

The Attorney General also stated that the DOJ “stands ready to make sure that bad actors do not take advantage of emergency response efforts, healthcare providers, or the American people during this crucial time.” This statement is particularly noteworthy for whistleblowers because it strongly suggests that the Government will be inclined to intervene in meritorious qui tam cases related to the coronavirus, dramatically enhancing whistleblowers’ ability to receive rewards.

Dollar MaskThe potential for massive fraud in connection with COVID-19 relief is clear. Congress has already appropriated COVID-19 relief funds totaling more than $2 trillion and counting – a mammoth sum considering that the federal Government’s total 2019 budget was only $4.45 trillion. The amounts include $8.3 billion under the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, $3.5 billion under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, and about $2 trillion under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act). Additional appropriations are expected.

Moreover, such funds are allocated for a broad range of purposes, including:

  • The research and development of vaccines, plasma therapy, therapeutics, biologics, and diagnostics.
  • Support for state, local, and international public health agencies.
  • The procurement of medical, surgical and laboratory instruments, equipment, and supplies, including PPE, ventilators, and other supplies for the National Strategic Stockpile.
  • COVID-19 testing, the funding of paid family sick leave and medical leave, and increased food stamps.
  • Loans and loan guarantees for states, cities, and municipalities (the “Main Street Lending Program”).
  • Loans and loan guarantees as well as tax credits, deferrals, and deductions for private sector businesses, including billions of dollars earmarked for certain industries including passenger airlines, the defense and national security industry, the healthcare industry, medical equipment manufacturers, and lending institutions.
  • A small business loan program to keep employees on the payroll and help pay essential expenses such as rent and utilities (the “Payroll Protection Program” or PPP).

DollarsAdditionally, an alphabet soup of departments and agencies are responsible for the expenditures, complicating the ability of Government auditors and Inspectors General to keep track. They include the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Small Business Administration (SBA), State Department, Agency for International Development, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Department of Defense (DOD), Strategic National Stockpile (SNS), Indian Health Service (HIS), and White House Coronavirus Taskforce.

Potential whistleblowers should be alert to and look out for activities which could serve as the basis for qui tam lawsuits under the False Claims Act in connection with COVID-19 spending. Those activities include individuals or businesses that are:

  • Engaging in collusive practices such as price-fixing or bid-rigging, for example in the sale of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or medical equipment.
  • Paying or receiving kickbacks to influence purchase or referral decisions, including in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) or the Physician Self-Referral Law (Stark law), which applies to referrals for medical care reimbursable by federal healthcare programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, TRICARE, and the Veterans Administration (VA).
  • Obtaining patient information for COVID-19 care and then using that information to bill federal healthcare programs for tests or procedures that were not authorized or rendered.
  • “Upcoding” or the use of improper medical billing codes to receive inflated reimbursements from federal healthcare programs.
  • Billing for care that is not medically necessary or for treatments or drugs the safety or efficacy of which are not supported.
  • Billing for medical care, treatments, diagnostics, or supplies that are unapproved or do not satisfy regulatory requirements or standards.
  • Making false or misleading statements in connection with the sale or marketing of products, including medical devices or pharmaceuticals.
  • Misrepresenting an applicant’s eligibility to receive reimbursements, loans, grants, or loan forgiveness, or making false statements on applications for any type of COVID-19 relief funds.
  • Falsifying grant applications or progress reports or fabricating research data.
  • Providing false certifications of compliance with regulatory or contractual requirements, for example that goods were manufactured in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations (CGMPs) or that goods or services comply with Buy American Act or the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
  • Falsely certifying that validation or testing procedures for products or services were followed.
  • Violating “best price” requirements in connection with prescription pharmaceutical reimbursements.
  • Selling goods that are defective or substandard.

If you have information about possible COVID-19 fraud, it is important to confer with an experienced whistleblower attorney like Mark A. Strauss to help evaluate the possibility of bringing a qui tam lawsuit. Reach out to us for a free and confidential consultation.

"I can't say how lucky I feel to have found Mark Strauss to represent me in my whistleblower case. He earned my trust and put me at ease from day one. He guided me through every step, and his work ethic and dedication were amazing..." Mehmet K., Istanbul, Turkey, client
"This is to thank you for the settlement and relator award .... Thank you for all you do to bring more justice in a world where it's needed so badly." David D., Hong Kong, client
"I was referred to Mark Strauss for my whistleblower case by another respected attorney. Mark's professionalism and expertise were apparent from our first meeting and throughout the handling of the case. It was a long process, but he was at my side the entire time, went above and beyond, and got a great result. I recommend him highly." Ken K., Great Neck, N.Y., client
"I enjoyed the argument. This is a well briefed, well argued case, which I don't get all the time. So I express my appreciation to ... counsel ...." Hon. Carla R. Bebault, United States District Court Judge, District of Minnesota
"This has been an extraordinarily well-tried case. I want to thank counsel ...." Hon. Edgardo Ramos, United States District Court Judge, Southern District of New York
"Mark is a zealous advocate for justice. His dogged efforts have led to substantial recoveries for his whistleblower and securities litigation clients. If you are looking for an attorney who is not afraid to face Goliath, Mark is the one." Christopher Studebaker, Esq., former colleague