Justia Lawyer Rating
The State Bar of California
Federal Bar

Grant Fraud

US DollarEach year the federal government awards tens of billions of dollars in grants to fund projects and programs for the benefit of the public. Recipients of grant monies include all levels of state and local government, not-for-profit organizations such as universities, charities, and for-profit businesses.

Grant fraud, however, is believed to cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars a year. Whistleblowers are needed to help stop this fraudulent behavior and prevent such losses.

Government Grants

In all, more than 1,000 federal grant programs are administered by some 26 grant-giving agencies. Grants are awarded for a wide range of purposes including scientific research, the development of drugs and vaccines, law enforcement, community development, disaster prevention, legal services, food assistance, and education.

The largest grant-making federal agency is the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). Significant grant monies are also awarded, however, by the Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), Department of Defense (DOD), Department of Education (ED), Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Common Grant Fraud Practices

Grant fraud typically consists of some form of untruthful dealing with the relevant federal agency. Potential whistleblowers should be alert to actionable practices including:

  • Falsifying compliance with the requirements governing how the grant funds should be spent.
  • Misusing grant funds or using them for unauthorized purposes such as to pay personal expenses or salaries or compensation unrelated to the purposes of the grant.
  • Submitting grant applications that contain false information or that omit information that is required to be disclosed.
  • Falsifying research data or results

US ResearchIn 2019, for example, Duke University paid $112 million to settle claims that that submitted claims for grant payments to the National Institute of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency based on falsified or fabricated scientific research data. The whistleblower who filed the qui tam lawsuit that exposed the fraud received a $33 million reward.

Grant Fraud Damages Can Include the Entire Dollar Value of the Grant

In traditional False Claims Act cases, the government’s damages are measured by the difference between the amount it paid and the value of the goods or services that, due to the fraud, it received.

Grant fraud cases, however, do not fit this rubric because the value that the government received is ordinarily not tangible or directly calculable.

Because of this, courts have developed another measure of damages for grant fraud cases – namely, the entire amount of the grant monies received. The rationale for this damages measure is that the fraud cost the government the opportunity to award the grant money to an honest recipient who would have used the money as intended.

This damages approach is highly advantageous to whistleblowers because qui tam awards are based on the size of the government’s recovery.

If you know about parties engaging in grant fraud and would like to speak to an experienced whistleblower attorney, reach out to us for a free and confidential consultation.

"I can't say how lucky I feel to have found Mark Strauss to represent me in my whistleblower case. He earned my trust and put me at ease from day one. He guided me through every step, and his work ethic and dedication were amazing..." Mehmet K., Istanbul, Turkey, client
"This is to thank you for the settlement and relator award .... Thank you for all you do to bring more justice in a world where it's needed so badly." David D., Hong Kong, client
"I was referred to Mark Strauss for my whistleblower case by another respected attorney. Mark's professionalism and expertise were apparent from our first meeting and throughout the handling of the case. It was a long process, but he was at my side the entire time, went above and beyond, and got a great result. I recommend him highly." Ken K., Great Neck, N.Y., client
"I enjoyed the argument. This is a well briefed, well argued case, which I don't get all the time. So I express my appreciation to ... counsel ...." Hon. Carla R. Bebault, United States District Court Judge, District of Minnesota
"This has been an extraordinarily well-tried case. I want to thank counsel ...." Hon. Edgardo Ramos, United States District Court Judge, Southern District of New York
"Mark is a zealous advocate for justice. His dogged efforts have led to substantial recoveries for his whistleblower and securities litigation clients. If you are looking for an attorney who is not afraid to face Goliath, Mark is the one." Christopher Studebaker, Esq., former colleague