Filing a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act (FCA) is one of the most powerful tools available to fight fraud against the federal government. The FCA allows individuals—known as whistleblowers or relators—to file legal actions on behalf of the United States and share in any financial recovery. These lawsuits have recovered billions of dollars in taxpayer funds, often exposing complex schemes in healthcare billing, customs fraud, federal contracting, and beyond.
At Mark A. Strauss Law, we represent whistleblowers in qui tam litigation across the nation. Whistleblower lawyer Mark A. Strauss can help potential whistleblowers navigate the complex process of filing claims under the FCA with discretion, rigor, and an unwavering commitment to integrity.

Understanding the False Claims Act and Qui Tam Provisions
The False Claims Act (“FCA”), codified at 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733, imposes civil liability on any person or entity that knowingly submits, or causes to be submitted, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval to the United States government. The Act also covers the use of false records or statements material to such claims, as well as conspiracies to violate its provisions.
“Reverse” False Claims
It is important to note that the FCA’s reach extends beyond affirmative false claims. The so-called “reverse false claims” provisions, found in 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(G), impose liability on those who knowingly make, use, or cause to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the government, or who knowingly and improperly avoid or decrease such an obligation.
In other words, the “reverse” false claims provisions make it a violation to defraud the United States out of money that it’s owed. Common examples include knowingly underreporting customs duties—including antidumping and countervailing duties— as well as failing to refund overpayments received from government programs, or concealing obligations to pay fees, fines, or penalties.
Furthermore, liability attaches not only to making false statements to reduce or avoid payments owed to the government, but also to concealing, improperly retaining, or failing to remit funds or property that should be paid to the United States.
Qui Tam (Whistleblower) Actions
A hallmark of the False Claims Act (FCA) is its qui tam mechanism, which empowers private individuals—known as “relators” or whistleblowers—to bring civil actions on behalf of the United States against parties alleged to have defrauded federal programs.
When a relator initiates a qui tam action, the complaint must be filed under seal in federal court. This means the lawsuit is kept confidential and not served on the defendant at the outset. The seal remains in place for at least 60 days, though the government frequently requests and is often granted extensions, resulting in cases sometimes remaining under seal for months or even years.
The purpose of the seal is to allow the government to investigate the allegations discreetly, determine whether to intervene, and avoid tipping off the defendant or interfering with ongoing investigations. During this period, only the government and the relator are aware of the lawsuit’s existence.
In addition to filing a complaint under seal, the whistleblower is required to provide the government with a written disclosure statement. The disclosure statement must include all material evidence and information in the relator’s possession. It is submitted confidentially to the U.S. Department of Justice and is often the government’s first opportunity to evaluate the case.
While the case is under seal, the government reviews the allegations and evidence provided to decide whether to intervene and assume primary responsibility for prosecuting the action. During this period, the whistleblower may be asked to assist in the investigation. That assistance can take many forms, including answering questions, supplying documents, and helping interpret internal records or policies. The more credible and substantial the evidence, the more likely the government is to join the case.
If the government intervenes, it leads the litigation. If the government declines to intervene, the relator may proceed independently on the government’s behalf, though the government retains the right to intervene at a later stage.
Whistleblower Award Percentages
Whistleblowers who bring successful qui tam actions are entitled to a percentage of the government’s recovery. The percentage that applies depends primarily on whether the government intervenes in the case.
If the government intervenes and takes over the prosecution of the case, the relator is eligible for an award ranging from 15% to 25% of the total amount recovered, with the specific percentage determined by the court based on the significance of the whistleblower’s contribution and other relevant factors.
If the government declines to intervene and the whistleblower proceeds with the case independently, the potential award increases to between 25% and 30% of the recovery. This higher range reflects the greater risk and effort required when the whistleblower and their counsel litigate the claims without government support.
Factors affecting the reward include the quality and usefulness of the information provided by the whistleblower, the degree of assistance rendered during the investigation and litigation, the timing of the disclosure, whether the information was previously known to the government, and the extent of the whistleblower’s involvement in the alleged wrongdoing.
If the whistleblower “planned and initiated” the fraudulent activity, the court has the authority to reduce the whistleblower’s reward. If the whistleblower is convicted of criminal conduct arising from their role in planning or initiating the fraud, they are entirely precluded from receiving any award under the FCA.
The Role of a Whistleblower Attorney
FCA whistleblowers are not permitted to proceed pro se (without legal representation). Instead, the statute requires that they be represented by an attorney. At Mark A. Strauss Law, we provide personalized legal analysis at the outset, helping prospective relators assess whether they meet the legal criteria and whether the evidence supports moving forward with a claim.
We also advise on the best way to structure the case to encourage government intervention, which significantly increases the chances of success.
What Happens When the Government Makes Its Decision
When the Department of Justice concludes its review, it will inform the court whether it plans to intervene in the lawsuit. If it chooses to intervene, it takes over the case, and the relator continues as a party. If the government declines to intervene, the whistleblower may proceed independently with the lawsuit, although this path can be more challenging and typically requires a greater personal and legal commitment.
At this stage, the court lifts the seal and the case becomes public. The defendant is notified and required to respond. In many instances, this triggers settlement discussions. Some cases proceed to discovery and trial, depending on the facts, the strength of the evidence, and the defendant’s response. If the case succeeds—either through settlement or judgment—the whistleblower is awarded a share of the recovery, determined by the quality of their assistance and whether the government intervened.
Who Can File a Qui Tam Lawsuit?
Anyone with non-public, original information about fraud against the federal government may qualify as a whistleblower. This includes employees, contractors, subcontractors, business competitors, or even government entities under certain conditions. The law favors the first person to report the fraud. If another relator files a similar claim first, subsequent cases based on the same facts may be barred, regardless of the accuracy or severity of the allegations.
The information must be voluntarily disclosed, meaning it cannot be compelled by subpoena or legal obligation. While whistleblowers do not need definitive proof, they must have a reasonable belief, supported by specific facts, that a violation of the FCA has occurred.
How Long Will a Qui Tam Case Take?
There is no uniform timeline for qui tam cases. However, they generally take several years to revolve.
Despite the uncertainty, our firm remains engaged throughout. We work closely with our clients during the investigation and legal proceedings, advising on how best to present evidence, communicate with the government, and ensure compliance with procedural rules.
Legal Protections for Whistleblowers
The False Claims Act includes robust protections against retaliation. If an employer takes adverse action against a whistleblower—such as termination, demotion, harassment, or blacklisting—the relator may bring a separate retaliation claim. Remedies can include reinstatement, double back pay, special damages, and attorneys’ fees.
Why Choose Mark A. Strauss Law
Mark A. Strauss Law is committed to standing with whistleblowers who choose to speak up. With a focus on complex fraud, including customs fraud and trade violations, we bring tenacity and precision to every case. Our experience spans multiple sectors and jurisdictions, and our approach is grounded in discretion, legal acumen, and an unwavering commitment to doing what is right.
We understand that filing a qui tam lawsuit is not just a legal step but a personal and ethical one. You are choosing to challenge wrongdoing and uphold public trust. We are here to support you through every legal and procedural challenge you may face.
Contact Us for a Confidential Consultation
If you believe you have information about fraud against the federal government, contact Mark A. Strauss Law for a free and confidential consultation. We will help you determine whether you may have a successful qui tam claim and guide you through the process with integrity and professionalism.
Remember: Fraud is their game. Integrity is yours.
Fraud is their game.
Integrity is yours.
Free Consultation
No Fee Unless We Win!
Call or Text Now

Published By
Attorney Mark A. Strauss
Mark is a battle-hardened and tenacious anti-fraud attorney with more than twenty years of experience in complex civil litigation. He has represented qui tam whistleblowers under the False Claims Act as well as victims of fraud under the federal securities laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). His efforts have resulted in the recovery of hundreds of millions of dollars for clients.
Practices
Whistleblower Practices
- False Claims Act Whistleblower Lawsuits
- Customs Fraud
- COVID-19 Relief Fraud
- Healthcare Fraud
- Government Contracting & Procurement Fraud
- Grant Fraud
- Federal Credit Assistance Fraud
- Securities Law Violations & the SEC Whistleblower Program
- Tax Fraud & the IRS and New York State Whistleblower Programs
- State False Claims Acts